This is taken from an interview with Stephen Petty, P.E, C.I.H., C.S.P on the documentary series, C0v1d Revealed. Stephen Petty is the founder of EES Group, and a leading world expert in personal protective equipment, exposure and exposure control. He was a named expert in the Round Up Litigation and over the last twenty years has testified in 400 cases in personal protective equipment. He has acted as Exposure and PPE Warnings Expert in 33 cases.
Q: Should children be sent to school every day wearing a mask? What is the actual science?
Proving that masks cannot possibly work at the micro level
– “My biggest complaint is that the media and public attempt to go to medical doctors for expertise on exposure and exposure control. That is not their sandbox.”
– We have medical doctors talking about exposure / exposure controls. They are not qualified for this.
– This is not about “medical misinformation” – this is about exposure and exposure control
– Basically…if I use the word ´mask,´ it´s apparently “medical misinformation”
– Why masks don’t work. And why so much controversy?
– “Since I started going public, I’ve seen lot of language changed at the CDC – in a good way. I’ve had people at the CDC write to me.”
– Most of the science I’ve been talking about is over 100 years old. I wasn’t afraid of censorship. I continued as this is my job.
– Macro level – testified at Michigan, they wanted to prove that masks were the most effective way to prevent transmission. Failed.
– PPE – see Hierarchy Below
– Masks do not fit in the hierarchy of protection.
– PPE is better than masks, it´s uncomfortable, and as a consequence, people don’t wear them effectively
– You cannot seal a mask
– Respirators you can seal, and you cannot have facial hair
– N95 is a respirator. It is not a mask.
– Basic industrial hygiene science —> Masks are ineffective
– IMPORTANT: VIRUS = 0.1 MICRONS.
– A virus is a 1000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair
– Can you slip a human hair around your mask? Gaps a like a highway
– Is there any mitigating effect of masks?
– Masks will always have gaps. They will never be sealed.
– American Industrial Hygeince Association -a graphic was put out… even though if something has a little effiicacy, does not mean we should take that measure.
Relative Risk Reduction.
– If you want to reduce causes of Covid from X to Y, whatever you use, you should use 90% relative risk reduction.
– They showed masks were only 5-10% assuming correct fit, perfectly sealed masks. (N-95 with zero gaps)
– Masks cannot possibly be a solution when looking at relative risk reduction
– Having testified in many many cases – they are ineffective.
Q: Are there any adverse effects to wearing masks?
– I am not a board certified psychiatrist, so I cannot speak to this effectively, but what I will say is with regard to school children.
– Children have a hard time learning if they cannot read facial expressions
– Masks are a PERFECT BREEDING GROUND FOR MOULD AND BACTERIA
– WHEN YOU BREATHE IN THESE TOXINS….this leads to dis-ease (for example, bacterial pneumonia, symptoms for which the unreliable PCR test will likely detect as Covid.)
– When you restrict oxygen flow, you reduce oxygen to every cell in your body. OXYGEN IS OUR #1 CELL AND LIFE FUEL.
– Mixed signals from Fauci and CDC –
– Fauci originally said masks do not work. He was correct when he said this.
– With smoke – if you can see particles with normal life, they are 500 times greater than an invisible particle. Smoke is always getting around the gaps.
– Increased fresh air / solution / destruction technologies
– The best thing in the world is to be outdoors to get maxima dilutions – walks, beach, parks – open your windows and doors, allow circulation
– Dipole ionisation technology has 90% destruction of virus – air purifier – $400 will treat 6,000 square feet. Also put in schools.
– Behavioural Marketing – Testifying at RoundUp Trials
– Look at the issue of masks. There is no science basis for It. My opinion is: it is a control issue. It has nothing to do with science.
– CDC says “masks work” but when you look at the data, it clearly shows masks DO NOT work.
– Best study is Danish study, 6,000 people, half wore them, half didn’t, whether you did or didn’t, it made no significant difference in terms of getting disease.
– CDC criticises the study, and the criticism is invalid. CDC said it was only a small promotion of the Danish population. It makes no sense.
– Does wearing a mask affect disease rate or not? Criticisms are put out there as they do not like the results.
– There is no requirement to base a study on a percentage population of a country.
– Whenever you look at a mask study (that support their effectiveness) you will find that they don’t have a control group, in the studies they cite.
– Other studies that showed their apparent effectiveness had other variables at play as well – including air freshening.
– Look at where they have mask mandates. RATES GO UP. (Likely because they’re causing sickness / symptoms)
– Look at the gaps around the masks. A viron is 1,000 times smaller than a human hair. At 3 levels it doesn’t make any sense.
– Droplets: At first, we heard about Covid, wiping down surfaces, clean everything.
– More than 99% of particles emitted from monkeys were aerosols, a tiny proportion were droplets.
– Aerosols can stay in the air up to 50 days. Droplets fall to the ground within minutes.
– As soon as you say they’re aerosols, the 6ft rule is destroyed.
– Screenshot – know one knows where the 6 ft rule came from
– The 6 ft rule has no meaning. The mask has no meaning.
– Droplets are not the problem, aerosols are the problem. Droplets fall to the ground right away.
– Droplets do not carry as much of the virus as the little guys (aerosols) – aerosols are associated with disease, not the droplets.
– THE PUBLIC HAS BEEN MISINFORMED.
– The only argument / criticism to this is others claiming that a virus particle might be 0.2 or 0.3 microns. We’re talking about a few chairs on the titanic. This difference is meaningless.
– N95 is a respirator.
– It stunned me that the public health official said children need to wear masks
– They say “I was following the science. I was following the CDC” – and I said you’re not reading the documents. You’re not paying attention to the detail. The masks do not work. Aerosols are the primary concern. Masks do not stop aerosols. You’ve had plenty of time to read the science (actual science). It´s bogus.
– Science evolves with time. “Science” is normally paid for by invested interests. For example, go back in history and see the studies that showed smoking tobacco didn’t cause cancer. They were financed by the tobacco industry. The pharmaceutical industry finances the “science” that we see and finances the trials they are conducting to provide that a medication is safe and effective. This is a notable conflict of interest.
– The damage that has been done to science by the CDC and politics has led to people not trusting these organisations anymore.
– It´s unfortunate as people rely on these sources of information.
– I’ve been on a number of trials – people criticise juries. Whether we won or lost, I have a lot more faith in humanity. I know there are rogue cases out there. The public might not have the initial after their names. But people have good common sense and THEY CAN SMELL A RAT. THEY SENSE SOMETHING ISN´T RIGHT AND THEY KNOW SOMETHING ISN´T RIGHT
– Charts – Disease progression curve. They argue masks brought cases down. No, that’s disease easing, it was already happening.
– Charts – EVEN n95 is technically a respirator but bottom of the pile
– IMAGE – NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF WEARING MASKS – these are documented effects of MASK WEARING
– A risk analysis should always be carried out. This says, do the benefits of wearing a mask outweigh not wearing them? The WHO says you need to do this, before issuing a mask mandate. In other words, these effects of wearing a mask can CLEARLY outweigh the benefit.