EMFs, 5G And Their Effects On Human Health, Animals And Nature

In 2011 the World Health Organisation classified Electromagnetic Radiation as a possible carcinogen.

“Lyon, France, May 31, 2011 ‐‐ The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use.”[1]

In 2019 something significant happened in the world of electromagnetic radiation. The rollout of 5G technology began without a single biological test of safety. Thousands of studies have proven unequivocally that levels of EMFs prior to 5G were already causing human, animal cell and DNA damage. This is the make-up of all life form. Nature is being damaged, trees are being lopped down to provide for the 5G frequencies to travel and quite possibly the scariest of all, is its impacts on insect and bee colonies. We need bees to pollinate so we survive.

In 2019, The UK government allocated £200million of funding to facilitate the 5G rollout. This means that in the UK, and similar in other countries, we are guinea pigs for this technology that hundreds of scientists from around the world are calling to be halted.

[1] https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf

The evidence that radio frequency (rf) radiation is harmful to life forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer reviewed studies. This is even truer when you look at the studies that AREN’T funded by industry.

Many say that non-ionising radiation doesn’t harm humans.

That this technology will just “heat our skin a little bit” and that this isn’t dangerous.

This is an outdated hypothesis and completely ignores current science which shows there are many non-thermal, biological effects associated with non-ionising radiation, the kind of radiation 5G technology will emit from small cells as well as large towers, right outside your house, schools and shops 24/7.

The effects of non-ionising radiation

Check out this brief chapter of a 90-page book written by Martin L. Pall, PhD and Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University https://peaceinspace.blogs.com/files/5g-emf-hazards–dr-martin-l.-pall–eu-emf2018-6-11us3.pdf

Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals. Particularly concerning is the damage to insects such as bees.

Would you like to find out quick facts about 5G in the UK? This organisation called PHIRE Medical has been spear-heading the research in England for many years, together with researchers and scientists to provide the rock solid case and argument that this is halted. They can be found HERE.

Check out a large number of peer research articles here https://ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/

https://bioinitiative.org/ – 4000 studies

http://justproveit.net/studies– 1168 studies

https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp– 1,032 studies

Plus this study which cost $25 million by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) clearly show that biological impacts occur at non-thermal exposures like those that take place from cell phones today. https://ehtrust.org/cell-phone-radiofrequency-radiation-study/

Regulators are deliberately excluding the scientific evidence of harm.

Stakeholders are the ones funding the research and saying it is safe.

This was part of a Senate Inquiry in Australia

“It was contended that the telecommunications industry will try to influence research into electromagnetic emissions to show that there are no ill effects from its technology: If you are a researcher doing research that is being funded by industry, if you are coming up with results that are not what the company wants to hear, you will not get further funding. But if you give results that look good you tend to get further funding. So there is very much a bias to slant your research towards the person who is providing the funding. Some submissions have claimed that industry cover-ups and interference in the publication of research results, and selection bias in the choice of studies to be funded, are reasons for the failure to replicate many studies that have shown a relationship between EMR and biological and health effects.”

PHIRE MEDICAL – UK Organisation founded by Dr Erica Mallory-Blythe

PHIRE MEDICAL 5G REPORT – UK Organisation founded by Dr Erica Mallory-Blythe

Summary Chapter From 90-Page Book Non-Thermal Effects by Dr Martin Pall – Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University

NATIONAL TOXICOLOGY  PROGRAM– a $25 million US study which was intended to prove that EMFs were safe. The opposite was proven.

BIO INITIATIVE – 4000 peer-reviewed studies

POWER WATCH – 1,032 studies

JUST PROVE IT – 1168 peer-reviewed studies

1975 Defence Intelligence Agency Biological Effects Of Electromagnetic Radiation

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR BODY

My 3 favourite methods (outside of using wired headsets, phone off /in airplane mode at night, plenty of grounding and sunlight to mitigate the effects), are:

OMNIA RADIATION BALANCER (least expensive – for your phone, live-blood tested).

You can find my interview with the founder, Tim Sandars, here: https://vitalitysecret.com/how-to-protect-your-body-from-emfs/

You can use discount code “vitality” for 10% off.

SOMAVEDIC  

Protects your home by harmonizing the radiation. https://Somavedic.com – use “vitality” for 10% discount.

HAVN WEAR: EMF-Protective Underwear 

https://havnwear.com